by John D. Guandolo
In light of the new revelations about James Comey misleading Congress – read: “Lying to” – UTT believes it is a good point in time to discuss how, under Mr. Comey’s leadership, the FBI went from being a well-respected and premier government agency, to a tool for tyranny against American Patriots.
Make a Communist the FBI Director
In a world where America’s federal government functions as it is required to function, James Comey would have been rendered unable to hold a federal job back in 2003 when he publicly admitted he was a communist, and would have never been elevated to be the Director of the FBI.
On October 10, 2003, the New York Magazine published an article about James Comey entitled, “Mr. Comey Goes to Washington.”
Why that title? Because the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York – James Comey – was named the Deputy Attorney General of the United States, and would be confirmed on December 11 of 2003.
Yet, in the published interview, Comey admits he was a communist.
Mr. Comey told America he “was” a COMMUNIST, but adds he is not quite sure where he is politically today.
His actions over the years seem to make it clear where his true loyalties reside.
Evidence of Systemic Corruption
If the Department of Justice functioned according to the law and the Oaths of Office taken by those in authority and serving the American people, things would have gone very differently the day the New York Magazine article was published in which the nominee for Deputy Attorney General revealed he was a communist.
Comey’s nomination for Deputy Attorney General (DAG) would have been put on hold, and the FBI would have opened a counterintelligence investigation to determine Comey’s history with the communist party, his current affiliations, and his loyalty to the United States of America.
Comey certainly would never have been elevated to the position of Director of the FBI unless the system which elevated him was catastrophically corrupted.
Think about it this way: In the fall of 2013, America had an FBI Director, Director of Central Intelligence (John Brennan), and a President who were all communists.
The actions of these men do not reflect any indication they left the communist way behind.
As the Director of the FBI, James Comey did what would be expected of a communist working within the American system – destroy the very organization the government put him in charge of leading.
Destruction of the FBI, by the way, is Objective #35 of the 45 communist goals: “Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.”
Additionally, Mr. Comey’s public behavior sheds light on his internal beliefs.
In February 2015, James Comey gave a speech at Georgetown University.
He said, in part: “Unfortunately, in places like Ferguson and New York City, and in some communities across this nation, there is a disconnect between police agencies and many citizens—predominantly in communities of color…all of us in law enforcement must be honest enough to acknowledge that much of our history is not pretty…At many points in American history, law enforcement enforced the status quo, a status quo that was often brutally unfair to disfavored groups…little compares to the experience on our soil of black Americans…Many people in our white-majority culture have unconscious racial biases.”
Mr. Comey, the Director of the FBI at the time, failed to mention the riots in Ferguson, Missouri and elsewhere around America were organized and executed by the communist Chinese organization Liberation Road. These were violent communist actions on U.S. soil, and Mr. Comey never acknowledged this nor did he use his position of authority to do anything about it.
Should a communist instigated riot be blamed on police officers for not being sensitive enough about being white?
Mr. Comey’s claim that “much” of the history of American law enforcement is “not pretty” disgraces and discredits police in uniform who have served for decades doing the right thing every day, and is the regurgitation of a communist narrative.
To say, “Many people in our white-majority culture have unconscious racial biases” is also to regurgitate a long-standing communist narrative.
The Case of Hillary Clinton
FBI investigations reveal Hillary Clinton used numerous unsecure servers for her official work as the U.S. Secretary of State. Evidence Comey himself publicly laid out reveals:
*Mrs. Clinton sent Top Secret/Special Access classified emails via this unsecured systems
*Hostile actors hacked emails of those corresponding with Mrs. Clinton
*Mrs. Clinton used these unsecured systems “in the territory of sophisticated adversaries”
Mrs. Clinton also traveled to foreign countries with classified information on her unsecured devices knowing the host intelligence services could/would get that information. In cases where these nations – Saudi Arabia for example – donated money to the Clinton Foundation, a case of quid pro quo should have at least been investigated.
Under James Comey, no such investigation was initiated.
Treason and Sedition
Mr. Comey’s greatest destructive actions came as a part of his approval and renewal of the Application to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Court to initiate and maintain electronic surveillance on the President of the United States – Donald Trump – and his family and staff, in violation of numerous federal laws.
Mr. Comey conspired with the FBI’s Deputy Director (Andrew McCabe) and the Deputy Assistant Director of the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division (Peter Strzok) in this felonious undertaking and then lied about it publicly and to Congress.
It should be noted that James Comey promoted Andrew McCabe to FBI Deputy Director despite the fact agents at the FBI’s Washington Field Office overwhelmingly told FBIHQ in official questionnaires McCabe should never be in any positions of authority in the FBI because of his poor leadership.
As the evidence now public makes clear here and here, the information used in the FISA application to unlawfully electronically surveil the President, his staff and his family was untrue and intentionally falsified.
Yet, FBI Director James Comey approved it and the renewals nonetheless.
Why would he do that?
The answer seems right in front of us – James Comey admitted to being a communist and never seemed to leave that ideology behind.
How does the average American perceive the FBI today versus ten years ago, before James Comey took the helm?
The answer that comes to the reader’s mind should cause pause about how the FBI got to where it is today in such a short amount of time.
Communist Objective #35 – Significantly achieved by James Comey.