The Duty to Vote

November 6, 2016

The Duty to Vote

“We electors have an important constitutional power placed in our hands; Let us examine, then, with a sober, a manly . . . and a Christian spirit; let us neglect all party [loyalty] and advert to facts; let us believe no man to be infallible or impeccable in government any more than in religion; take no man’s word against evidence, nor implicitly adopt the sentiments of others who may be deceived themselves, or may be interested in deceiving us.”

Founding Father John Adams, First Vice President of the United States, 2nd President of the United States [John Adams, The Papers of John Adams, Robert J. Taylor, ed. (Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1977), Vol. 1, p. 81, from “‘U’ to the Boston Gazette” written on August 29, 1763.]


“Providence has given to our people the choice of their rulers, and it is the duty as well as the privilege and interest of our Christian nation to select and prefer Christians for their rulers.”

Founding Father John Jay. First Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Member and President of the Continental Congress, Governor of New York, Chief Justice of New York Supreme Court, One of Three Authors of the Federalist Papers [The Correspondence and Public Papers of John Jay, Henry Johnston, editor (New York: G. P. Punam’s Sons, 1893), Vol. IV, pp. 391-393, 403-419, letters to John Murray, October 12, 1816 and April 15, 1818]


On Tuesday November 8, 2016, Americans will make the most important choice in an election since the founding of the Republic.

As a national security organization, UTT has an obligation to lay out a clear understanding of the choice for President and Commander in Chief of these United States of America.

The Democrat party platform as well as information made public by Project Veritas, Wikileaks, and other sources reveals the DNC is pushing socialist policies which, historically, have only brought about the destruction of liberty and free market systems.  The DNC is involved in systemic voter fraud, collusion with nearly all of the major media outlets, and instigating violence against the Republican party and its candidate.

The Democrat candidate, Mrs. Clinton, has a long track record of national security failures including: directly supporting Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood in Libya and Syria as Secretary of State; enabling the penetration of our government by Muslim Brotherhood operatives including her closest ally Huma Abedin; as well as lying to the American people about the investigation by the FBI of her mishandling of classified information.

By taking numerous unsecure communication devices to foreign countries and receiving Top Secret (Special Access Program) information while there, Mrs. Clinton necessarily provided foreign governments the TS-SAP data in violation of U.S. federal law.  All government employees at that level know foreign governments will aggressively attack electronic communications.  Mrs. Clinton either did not care or intentionally allowed it nonetheless.  Either way her actions violated several federal laws.  It also raises questions of treason and espionage in that the Clinton Foundation receives tens of millions of dollars from the very nations who are likely recipients of our most sensitive information.

There is always a quid pro quo.


Mrs. Clinton worked with Saul Alinsky and taught his Rules for Radicals, a book about Marxist Revolutionary ideology dedicated to Satan, and she and the DNC are working directly with and supporting revolutionary groups like Black Lives Matter.  There is no evidence she will not continue the current policies of this White House and Department of Justice of using the full force of the federal government to step on local and state law enforcement agencies, as well as local governments, until they subordinate themselves to federal demands – even and especially when those demands are unconstitutional.

The Republican candidate is Donald Trump.  Mr. Trump defends the free-market system, the Republican form of government, and the national sovereignty of the United States.  Despite being rough around the edges and unable to articulate in detail some of the policies he will implement, he is clear about defending liberty, and destroying the corrupt Republican and Democrat systems and a bloated and ineffective federal government which are all fighting against him.  The same Republican and Democrat leaders who sip cocktails in Georgetown (Washington, DC) together and feign displeasure with one another on the floor of the house or in the media, are in for a rough Wednesday morning if Mr. Trump is elected.


While many who may vote for Mr. Trump may not feel that a Trump victory will be their victory, a defeat for Mr. Trump, will be a defeat for all of us.

This election is about liberty versus tyranny.  It is about beginning to turn the tide towards reclaiming our inalienable rights of life, liberty, property, and all the others.

This election is about the survival of the Republic.

Counterintelligence, deception, Democratic National Convention, Donald Trump, Espionage, Hillary Clinton, information battlespace, Information Warfare, International Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS, jihad, Law Enforcement, Muslim Brotherhood, Propaganda, Republican Debates, Terrorism, US Muslim Brotherhood, UTT , , , , , , , , , , , ,
About JG
John Guandolo is a US Naval Academy graduate, served as an Infantry/Reconnaissance officer in the United States Marines and is a combat veteran, served as a Special Agent in the FBI from 1996-2008, and was recruited out of the FBI by the Department of Defense to conduct strategic analysis of the Islamic threat. He is the President and Founder of Understanding the Threat (UTT).

    Furthermore, since Jonathon Holmes Gruber, an American professor of economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, director of the Health Care Program at the U.S. National Bureau of Economic Research and key architect of “ObamaCare” has publically stated – seemingly as a matter of pride – that success of: the legislative process; marketing strategies; and public perception related to the oxymoronic fraud he perpetrated on the contextually helpless American people I.e. the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” of 2010, was attributable to “the stupidity of the American voter”, which “was critical to getting anything passed”, then Jonathon Holmes Gruber should be questioned by the FBI in connection with “Causation”, vis-à-vis federal law, respecting the following crimes:

    a) perjured testimony to a U.S. House Committee on Government Reform (2014)
    b) fraudulent representations involving the purpose & cost relevant to contextual expenditures by the U.S. Treasury ($400,000 of which he pocketed as a consultant for Health & Human Services).
    c) RICO implications applicable to interstate fraud under false pretenses, for which in addition to scamming the treasury, he “cleaned the contextual clocks” of: Wisconsin; Minnesota; West Virginia; and Michigan at a respective cost to their citizens of: $400,000; $329,000; $129,500; and $481,050.

    The $1,739,550 MIT “genius” Jonathon Gruber banked, since the “Affordable Care Act”, much like a gun or a knife, in the lingo of law-enforcement, is nothing more than a diabolical “implement of crime” I.e. to effectively deny critical health care to the aged unable to afford its burgeoning cost, and who will thus die as the result of said scheme, will thus also vacate the Social Security rolls by the thousands, which is the end game Gruber was after. I.e. “eliminate the cost to the government of both health care for the aged & Social Security benefits, all together, then shift the savings derived to the support of illegals & targeted voters”. I.e., think “holocaust for the aged”. And lest you forget, Pollyanna, watch your back and remember, “Evil hides in the mind, not on the face”. or so said “Voltaire”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *