What Can We Learn from the Hunt For & Killing of Islamic State Leader Al Baghdadi?

October 28, 2019

What Can We Learn from the Hunt For & Killing of Islamic State Leader Al Baghdadi?

Written by John D. Guandolo

On Sunday morning, President Trump announced the leader of the Islamic State (formerly ISIS), Abu Bakr al Baghdadi, was killed during a raid by U.S. forces.

In the midst of government statements, media reports, and talking heads commenting, UTT offers this perspective on the killing of al Baghdadi and lessons we can and should learn form it.

Three things seem relevant and of great necessity to discuss:

  1. How the decision was made to release Al Baghdadi from U.S. custody in 2004.
  2. Al Baghdadi’s understanding of Islam and why it was taught to Islamic State fighters.
  3. The strategic impact, if any, of his death.

Decision to Release Baghdadi

The U.S. military confirmed al Baghdadi was in U.S. custody for ten months in 2004 and then released. Why was al Baghdadi released? Like thousands of other jihadis, al Baghdadi was released because U.S. officials thought he was not “significant.” Despite information al Baghdadi was involved with the Muslim Brotherhood as a young man, many officials believed he was “radicalized” during or after his imprisonment.

U.S. officials making decisions on which prisoners to keep in custody and which prisoners to release had, and still have, no understanding of sharia and how it drives jihadis on the battlefield. This makes it very difficult to discern which prisoners truly constitute a long-term threat and which ones do not.

Baghdadi’s Understanding of Islam

President Trump’s comments Sunday morning on the actions of the Islamic State raise the question, “Where did al Baghdadi and his soldiers learn the war-fighting methods and punishments they inflicted on those they encountered and fought?”

Mr. Trump said the following:

“But they (ISIS) killed many, many Americans. Their murder of Americans James Foley, Steven Sotloff, Peter Kassig, and Kayla Mueller, were especially heinous. The shocking publicized murder of a Jordanian pilot…he was burned alive in a cage for all to see. On execution of Christians in Libya and Egypt, as well as the genocidal mass murder of Yazidis, rank ISIS among the most depraved organizations in the history of our world.”

Why did the Islamic State set a Jordanian pilot on fire? Where did Islamic State fighters learn to crucify and behead people? Where did Islamic State fighters learn to whip people publicly or amputate their hands for stealing?

The Islamic State holds daily classes on the Koran, hadith, tafsir, and matters of sharia in the combat zones when they were not engaged in combat. They published magazines, videos, and online articles detailing why they do what they do. The Islamic State consistently states they do what they do because it is a command from Allah to wage war against non-muslims until sharia is the law of the land on the planet.

It should be noted that it is a capital crime in Islam, under the Law of Apostasy, for muslims to teach other muslims anything about Islam that is incorrect.

UTT agrees with the President that the actions of the Islamic State/ISIS are “depraved,” however, UTT has not found any Islamic State/ISIS teachings which contradict the authoritative core teachings in Islam from widely used and universally accepted Islamic sources.

The example of the Jordanian pilot who was burned alive serves as an excellent example. Two of the four schools of sunni Islamic jurisprudence – the Shafi and Maliki schools – agree those found guilty of killing muslims without right under sharia “should be killed with a weapon which is similar to the weapon he used in his crime and in the same mode of his execution of it.” [Hudud: Islamic Criminal Law, Sidahmad, Malaysia, 1993, pg 221]

The Jordanian pilot bombed people, and bombs kill people in a number of ways including via fire. Therefore, setting him on fire was a lawful action in Islam.

Al Baghdadi did not make up his war-fighting methodology. He simply followed the example of Islam’s “beautiful pattern of conduct” (Koran 33:21) for all muslims for all times – Mohammad – who beheaded people and participated in/condoned killing those who mocked him, torture, sex slavery, and all other kinds of actions we see/saw from the Islamic State.

The fact Americans are shocked when Islamic leaders and Islamic armies wage war the way Islam commands is quite perplexing. It reveals a lack of understanding of the threat – Islam and its doctrine.

The Strategic Impact of al Baghdadi’s Death

What is the strategic impact of killing Islamic State leader al Baghdadi?

Currently, the United States has not identified the enemy in this 18 year old war in which it is engaged. Therefore, it is, as a practical matter, impossible to develop a coherent strategy for victory in this war if the enemy and the enemy’s doctrine are not clearly defined.

So while killing the leader of an evil, dangerous and destructive designated Foreign Terrorist Organization is a good thing, it likely will not have any significant strategic impact in the broader Islamic Movement across the globe.

When the American national security apparatus decides to acknowledge the enemy and its doctrine, America’s ability to win the war will increase exponentially.

UTT , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
About JG
John Guandolo is a US Naval Academy graduate, served as an Infantry/Reconnaissance officer in the United States Marines and is a combat veteran, served as a Special Agent in the FBI from 1996-2008, and was recruited out of the FBI by the Department of Defense to conduct strategic analysis of the Islamic threat. He is the President and Founder of Understanding the Threat (UTT).

    Following America’s declaration of war* on the Empire of Japan on the 8th of December 1941, U.S. Marine Corps officers in the Solomon Islands didn’t need to “define the enemy” for their rank & file Marines because they already instinctively knew that they were the ones who were shouting “Banzai” and trying to kill them. Thus make no mistake Pollyanna, those same sharia adherent “Allah akbar” shouting Muslims being recruited by the naive “leader” of the FBI as special agent trainees via magazine ads, will eventually attempt to do the same thing when Islam’s 3200 urban-war Mosque outposts in the United States are given the phase-5 signal from, probably Ankara, Turkey, i.e., to start killing infidels ala the Mexican border technique.

    *Anyone experiencing an intensified level of concern for the safety of their loved ones in the aftermath of said barbaric slaughter who may wish to own a verbatim Arabic-to-English translation of Islam’s May 22, 1991 declaration of war on Western civilization, the original of which was seized by special agents of the FBI in accordance with a federal search warrant from a subterranean basement in Annandale, Virginia USA in 2004, need simply contact: http://www.securefreedom.org to request (for a nominal handling & postage fee): GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT 003-0085 3:04-CR-240-G U.S. v. HLF , et al.

  2. “ We have an enemy inside our perimeter. But for this nation, the challenge is not just an inability to distinguish friend from foe. Rather, it is an unwillingness to do so.” Quoted from Sharia the Threat Team B II Report.

  3. I still agree with your education on this matter of Shariah being emphasized. Then strategy can be implemented. I just feel so helpless trying to support our committed men and women serving. I just pray and do my best to donate.

  4. Maybe it is timing I don’t know, however the press secretary will deny Al Bagdadi was an Islamic scholar. Maybe aware of the usual uprising that can accompany such confirmation.

  5. I agree strategically, there will be other scholars who will step up to lead Isis or any other islamic terror group again using the same doctrine, it was hard to see the organizations that promote the the deception had a meeting at the WH however at the same time Bagdadi was found. My concern is that first we have to prevent saturation and growth within the United States and the collusion with islamic terror cells and drug cartels who use each other and spreading out to all towns cities and states so effective to convert minds away from a stable society by causing chaos and misinformation campaigns they are required by the doctrine to spread, and do so effectively by ommission and deception. Informing how the doctrine or ideology explains the behavior and can predict situations must be examined so the alliance with OIC countries will no longer occur. Once that is understood the diversity movement will not be blind to the aftermath of hiring practices, laws that prohibit the spread, to restrict this teaching will secure our future. Ignorance as they say in this situation and of the ideology can be deadly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *